← Library
Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/737/2015dismissed

Thaiyammal v. The Superintendent Of Police

2015-08-18Honourable Mr Justice S. Nagamuthu,Honourable Mr Justice V. S. Ravi2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.08.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI H.C.P(MD)No. 737 of 2015 Thaiyammal .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Nallatinputhur Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

3. Murugalakshmi

4. Saravanan

5. Jothimuthu

6. Devarathinam

7. Muthusamy

8. Sorimuthu

9. Murugesan .. Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, praying for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the person or body of petitoner's son, the detenue, namely Thothirakani, S/o.Late. Murugesan, aged about 33 years, before this Court and set him at liberty.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Poorna Chandran For Respondents 1&2 : Mr. K.S.Duraipandian Additional Public Prosecutor For R3 to R9 : No Appearance

O R D E R

*********** [Order of the Court was made by S.NAGAMUTHU,J] The petitioner is the mother of one Thothirakani, S/o.Murugesan, aged 33 years. According to the petitioner, Mr. Thothirakani was taken to Chennai in the year 2007 for some work, but he did not return thereafter. The petitioner has made a complaint in this regard, only after eight years. Based on the same, a case has been registered in Crime No.172 of 2015 for 'man missing' and same is under investigation. In this circumstance, the petitioner has come up with this Habeas Corpus Petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents and we have also perused the records carefully.

3. There is no explanation for the delay of about eight years in making the compliant. The investigation is taken in a right direction and it not a case of illegal detention, we are inclined to dismiss this petition.

4. In view of the same, this Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed, leaving it open for the petitioner to work out her remedy in the manner known to law.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar[Per.Admn] /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Nallatinputhur Police Station, Thoothukudi District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 cc to Mr.J.Selvam, Advocate SR.No.47461.

ORDER MADE IN H.C.P(MD)No.737 of 2015 18.08.2015 P2/5C SH:JGB-DP:03.09.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/