Ajithkumar v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 05/04/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL OP(MD). No.6292 of 2022
1. Ajithkumar
2. C.Balamurugan ... Petitioners/Accused No.1 & 3 Vs State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar Rural Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
(Crime No.47 of 2022).
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : M/s.Chandrasekar R, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.R.Sivakumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.47 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/A1 to A4, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC, in Crime No.47 of 2022, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel between the parties, due to which, the petitioners abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and attacked him and also caused injuries. Hence the complaint.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocents and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the first petitioner was arrested today i.e., on 05.04.2022. He would further submit that the injured was discharged from the hospital.
5.Since the first petitioner was arrested, this petition is dismissed as against the first petitioner is concerned. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the facts that the injured was already discharged from the hospital, that except the offence under Section 506(ii) IPC, all other offences are bailable in nature and also the fact that the second petitioner is not having any previous case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the second petitioner with certain conditions.
7.Accordingly, the second petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Virudhunagar, on condition that the second petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: a)the second petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b)the second petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.
(c)the second petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d)the second petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the second petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the second petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(f)if the accused/ second petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC. Sd/- 05/04/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.I) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
SJI Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
TO
1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR.
2. -DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUTHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.
3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIRUDHUNAGAR RURAL POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.6292 of 2022 Date :05/04/2022 SP/SVR/SAR I/13/04/2022/3P/5C