Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17676/2016allowed

Rajkumar v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2016-10-03Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.10.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM Crl.O.P.(MD) Nos.17676 and 17677 of 2016 1.Rajkumar 2.Ranjith 3.Honest Raj 4.Arun Pandi 5.Agustin 6.Nagadurai : Petitioners/A1 to A6 -vs1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Sub Inspector of Police, Sathankulam Police Station, Thoothukudi District. : 1st respondent/Complainant 2.Joseph Wilson : 2nd respondent/De-facto complainant Prayer in Crl.O.P(MD)No.17676 of 2016: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to the charge sheet in C.C.No.17 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam and quash the same and pass such further orders.

1.Rajkumar 2.Ranjith 3.Agustin 4.Muthuraj 5.Nagadurai : Petitioners/A1 to A6 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Sub Inspector of Police, Sathankulam Police Station, Thoothukudi District. : 1st respondent/Complainant 2.Joseph Wilson : 2nd respondent/De-facto complainant Prayer in Crl.O.P(MD)No.17677 of 2016: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to the charge sheet in C.C.No.283 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam and quash the same and pass such further orders.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Balakrishnan For 1st Respondent : Mr.K.Anbarasan Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) For 2nd Respondent : Mr.V.Kannan COMMON ORDER These petitions have been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records relating to the charge sheet in respect of C.C.Nos.17 and 283 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam and to quash the same against the petitioners, respectively.

2.When the matter was called on 21.09.2016, the petitioners, in both the cases and the de-facto complainant with their respective counsel, appeared in person. They have filed a joint Memorandum of compromise respectively stating that the matter has already been compromised between the parties and the de-facto complainant has no objection to quash the charge sheet in respect of C.C.Nos.17 and 283 of 2014 stating that the disputes have been settled between them. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are ready to denote Rs.5,000/-, in each cases, to the Harijan Sevak Sangh, Madurai. 3.In view of the above, this court directed the petitioners to pay Rs.5,000/-, in each cases, to Tamil Nadu Harijan Sevak Sangh, N.M.R.Subbaraman Memorial Residential Primary School Campus, 12, Dr.Thangaraj Road, Vinayagar Nagar, Opposite to Law College, Madurai-20 and also this court dispensed with the appearance of the parties.

4.Today, when the matter is called, the receipts have been filed. In view of the statement made by the parties and the joint compromise memos filed by them, no fruitful purpose will be achieved to proceed further in both the cases. 5.In view of that, these petitions are allowed and the charge sheet in respect of C.C.Nos.17 and 283 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam, is quashed against the petitioners. The joint compromise memos shall form part of the record.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CSII) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar

er 1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Sathankulam Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High court, Madurai.

+2cc to Mr.R.Balakrishnan Advocate Sr.No. 55294,55295 JAM/26.10.16/DB /3p-6c Crl.O.P.(MD) Nos.17676 and 17677 of 2016 03.10.2016