Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17699/2016allowed

Elango v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-09-20Honourable Mr Justice B. Gokuldas2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.GOKULDAS CRL OP(MD) No.17699 of 2016 1 ELANGO 2 BACKIALAXMI 3 SURULIAMMAL 4 SELVAM 5 SEKAR 6 PANDIARAJAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIRUVEEDU POLICE STATION, NILAKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.MOORTHY Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Petitioners, who are arrayed as accused pray for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for offences punishable under Sections 147,294(b) and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.113/2016 on the file of respondent police.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant and abused him in filthy language.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the is the case and counter case.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that no one has sustained injury and the investigation is pending.

5. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made, this Court is of the view that the petitioners can be granted the relief prayed for and accordingly; (a) In the event of arrest by or on appearance before the respondent police;

(b) In the event of appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakkottai, within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

(i) Petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on each of them executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum to their satisfaction; (ii) The petitioners shall be available for interrogation by the respondent police as and when required.

sd/- 20/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKOTTAI.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIRUVEEDU POLICE STATION, NILAKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.S.MOORTHY Advocate SR.No. 53754 JA-DB-SAR.3/23.09.2016/2P:6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17699 of 2016 Date :20/09/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/