Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17721/2016disposed of

S.P.Pandiselvam, v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2016-09-20Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.09.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM Crl.O.P.(MD).No.17721 of 2016 S.P.Pandiselvam .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thirukostiyur Police Station, Sivagangai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Mathagupatti Police Station, Sivagangai District.

.. Respondents (R3 suo motu impleaded as third respondent, as per the order of this Court in this petition) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents to register the FIR on basis of the complaint of the petitioner, dated 30.05.2016. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sankaranarayanan For Respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the respondents to register the FIR on basis of the complaint of the petitioner, dated 30.05.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the complaint preferred by the petitioner before the first respondent has been transferred to the file of the Inspector of Police, Mathagupatti Police Station, Sivagangai District for enquiry and that the petition enquiry is pending. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.In view of the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate, the Inspector of Police, Mathagupatti Police Station, Sivagangai District, is suo motu impleaded as the third respondent in this petition and the third respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the third respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC). In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law.

5.This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P&A) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar am To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thirukostiyur Police Station, Sivagangai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Mathagupatti Police Station, Sivagangai District.

4.The Addl. Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.G.Sankaranarayanan, Advocate Sr.No. 54369 JAM/05/10/16/PV/ 2p-6c Crl.O.P(MD)No.17721 of 2016 20.09.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/