← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7641/2018ordered

Karmegam v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-05-09Honourable Mrs Justice R. Tharani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Ninth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI CRL OP(MD) No.7641 of 2018 KARMEGAM ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PARAMAKUDI TALUK POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT, CRIME NO.58/2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.K.MATHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.SUYMABULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate(Crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as sole accused, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) IPC in Crime No.58 of 2018, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioner is said to have attacked the defacto complainant and also threatened him with dire consequences. Thus, on complaint, a case has been registered against the petitioner. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and his name has been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent Police on instructions would submit that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and investigation is still pending.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and

also considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a]the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d]on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate / Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate / Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala (2005 AIR SCW 5560). sd/- 09/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PARAMAKUDI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PARAMAKUDI TALUK POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.K.MATHAN Advocate SR.No.8385

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7641 of 2018 Date :09/05/2018 SMA/CM/VK/11.05.2018:2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/