Ramasamy@Kannan v. The Sub Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Fourth day of April Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.4509 of 2017 RAMASAMY @ KANNAN ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARANERI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT CRIME NO.81 OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.N.DILIP KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as sole accused, in Crime No.81 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) IPC and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State. 3.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant went to his father-in-law's house to bring back her wife, quarrel arose and the accused persons abused him with filthy language and assaulted him with sticks and hands.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. 5.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent on instructions submitted that the petitioner is the father-in-law and the defacto complainant is the son-in-law and the injured was discharged from the hospital.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the Judicial Magistrate, Sivakasi, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 24/04/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,SIVAKASI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARANERI POLICE STATION,VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.N.DILIP KUMAR Advocate SR.No.20916 CM GJM/PM-PN/SAR-IV/25.04.2017 : 2P/6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.4509 of 2017 Date :24/04/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/