Pandiyammal, v. The Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM CRL OP(MD) No.17918 of 2016 1 PANDIYAMMAL, 2 SURYA, ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.1 & 2 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BATLAGUNDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT IN CRIME NO. 320 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, pray for the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324, 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.320 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 10.09.2016, the petitioners made a quarrel with the de-facto complainant with regard to Vinayakar Sathurthi Festival and attacked him with hands.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case.
4.Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5.On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made, this Court is of the view that the petitioners can be granted the relief prayed for and accordingly; (a) In the event of arrest by or on appearance before the respondent police;
(b) In the event of appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, Dindigul District within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order, (i) petitioners shall be https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
enlarged on bail on each of them executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum to their satisfaction; (ii) petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii) petitioner No. 2 shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for two weeks and thereafter as and when required and the first petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required.
sd/- 21/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKOTTAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DIDNDUGAL DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BATLAGUNDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate SR.No.54545
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.17918 of 2016 Date :21/09/2016 SMA/SKS-RR/SAR-I/26/09/2016 :2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/