← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4579/2017ordered

Karunakaran v. The Inspector Of Police

2017-04-18Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of April Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.4579 of 2017 1 KARUNAKARAN 2 PRAVEEN RAJ 3 SELVATHI 4 SAMPATH KUMAR 5 GANESAN 6 SATHIYANANTHAM ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.2,3,5,6,7 & 9 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAMAKUDI TALUK POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. 111/2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.BOOMINATHAN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A-2, A-3, A-5 to A-7 and A9, in Crime No.111 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324 and 307 of I.P.C r/w Section 4 of TNPWH Act and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State. 3.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent on instructions submitted that three years back, there was a dispute between the parties, because of that motive, the occurrence is said to have taken place on 07.04.2017 and in which, the petitioners along with other accused, said to have attacked the defacto complainant and his family members with deadly weapons causing injuries. She further submitted that the injured was discharged from the hospital.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner Nos.2 and 3 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation and the petitioner Nos.1 and 4 to 6 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 18/04/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,PARAMAKUDI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PARAMAKUDI TALUK POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.BOOMINATHAN Advocate SR.No.20277 PM CSL/KKR/SAR-III/20.04.2017 : 2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4579 of 2017 Date :18/04/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/