Rajenthiran, v. The Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH CRL OP(MD) No.7718 of 2018 RAJENTHIRAN ... PETITIONER / RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANTI LAND GRABBING SPECIAL CELL, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
(CR.NO.5/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.T.VEERAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 465, 468, 471 r/w. 109, 120-B of IPC., in Crime No.5 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to the property dispute, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint before the respondent police. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that as of now the dispute between the defacto complainant and the petitioner herein has been settled before the Lok Adalat in O.S.No.32 of 2018 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Ramanathapuram.
4. The above said submission is recorded. Further, taking note of the fact that the dispute between the defacto complainant and the petitioner has been settled before the Lok Adalat, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Ramanathapuram, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer, who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.
sd/- 16/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.2, RAMANATHAPURAM.
2.-DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM.
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANTI LAND GRABBING SPECIAL CELL, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.T.VEERAKUMAR Advocate SR.No. 8618
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.7718 of 2018 Date :16/05/2018 pjl JM/SV MMS/GSR/21.05.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/