← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17998/2016ordered

R.Robinson, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2016-09-23Honourable Mr Justice C. T. Selvam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Third day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM CRL OP(MD) No.17998 of 2016 R.ROBINSON ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No. 2 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C.C.I.W.C.I.D. NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT IN CRIME NO.3/2003 ...RESPONDENT(S) / COMPLAINANT(S) For Petitioner : M/S.L.SHAJI CHELLAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.V.RAJARAJAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Petitioner/A2, who was arrested on 01.09.2016 for offences punishable under Sections 406, 419, 420, 368 r/w 34 and 109 IPC in Crime No.3 of 2003 on the file of respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that petitioner impersonated the husband of A3 with her assistance and A1 and other accused obtained a loan of Rs.7,55,280/- from a cooperative bank.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner was unaware of the case since the case was registered in the year 2003 and petitioner went abroad in the year 2000. He adds that in a discharge petition filed by a co-accused the concerned Court while dismissing the same thought it fit to direct further investigation.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) vehemently oppose for grant of bail informing that the case is pending 10 long years and petitioner had been arrested on 13.08.2016 on his entry into India based on the issue of Red Corner Notice against him.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner has been in custody from 01.09.2016, this Court is inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her executing a bond in a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, CCIW, Special Court, Tirunelveli and on condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required.

sd/- 23/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, CCIW, SPECIAL COURT, TIRUNELVELI. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C.C.I.W.C.I.D. NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT IN CRIME NO.3/2003 4 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI. 5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.L.SHAJI CHELLAN Advocate SR.No.55125 JA-SKS-RR/AR.II-23.09.2016-2P:7C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17998 of 2016 Date :23/09/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/