Suseela @ Suseelabai, v. The Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM CRL OP(MD) No.18004 of 2016 1 SUSEELA @ SUSEELABAI 2 SOBHARANI @ SEVARANI 3 SELVERT RAJ ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.2,3 & 7 Vs STATE REP.BY , THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, COLACHEL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT CRIME NO. 6 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.C.HEROLD SINGH Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate(Crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, pray for the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 406 of I.P.C., and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act in Crime No.6 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the first accused along with the petitioners demanded more dowry and sent the de-facto complainant out of the matrimonial home.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are the in-laws of the de-facto complainant and they have been falsely implicated in this case.
4.Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) also submitted that the petitioners are the in-laws of the de-facto complainant. 5.On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made, this Court is of the view that the petitioners can be granted the relief prayed for and accordingly; (a) In the event of arrest by or on appearance before the respondent police;
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
(b) In the event of appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kuzhithurai within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order, (i) petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on each of them executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two common sureties each for the like sum to their satisfaction;
(ii) petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii) The petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required.
sd/- 21/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KUZHITHURAI, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, COLACHEL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECTUOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.S.C.HEROLD SINGH Advocate SR.No.54863 AKV CSL/GSV-PM/AR-I/26.09.2016: 2P/6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.18004 of 2016 Date :21/09/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/