R.Immanuel Arunraj v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Eighteenth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.7769 of 2018 1 R.IMMANUEL ARUNRAJ 2 A.RICHARD 3 M.VASANTHA 4 R.SAMRAJ HARRIS 5 M.JUSTIN GOPINATH ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C3, S.S.COLONY POLICE STATION, MADURAI (CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT For Petitioner : M/S.T.ANTONY ARUL RAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 498(A), 506(ii) I.P.C and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women's Harassment Act, in Crime No.355 of 2018 , seek anticipatory bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) for the respondent.
3. A meeting was arranged in my Chamber between the defacto complainant and the first petitioner. The child was also present on one occasion. The parties had a civil and courteous conversation. This Court expresses its hope that the parties would settle their difference amicably. The parties must bear in mind that the interest of the child is paramount and that in the fight between them the child's interest should not be trampled underfoot. This case is not such a nature in which the petitioners need to be arrested. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4.Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Additional Mahila Court, Madurai and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two common sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.
sd/- 18/06/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE ADDITIONAL MAHILA JUDGE, MADURAI 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C3, S.S.COLONY POLICE STATION, MADURAI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.T.ANTONY ARUL RAJ Advocate SR.No.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.7769 of 2018 Date :18/06/2018 SMA/PN/GSR:20.06.2018:2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/