Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8469/2022disposed of

Veerapandi v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-04-29Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

CRL OP(MD) No.8469 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 29/04/2022 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN CRL OP(MD). No.8469 of 2022 Veerapandi ... Petitioner/Accused No.11 Vs State Rep by Inspector of Police, Thiruppuvanam Police station, Sivagangai District.

(Crime No.432 of 2020) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.J.Vijayaraja Advocate For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.432/2020 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A11 was arrested on 07.10.2020 and remanded to judicial custody for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 506(ii), 120(B), 399, 402 IPC r/w 8(c), 20(b)(ii) (c) and 25 of NDPS Act, 1985 and Section 20 and 30 of Arms Act, in Crime No.432 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The petitioner is facing the charges for the above said offences. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.01.2020 and ever since he is in custody. The final report has been filed and taken cognizance by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, namely the Presiding Officer, Special Court for EC and NDPS Act cases, Pudukkottai, in C.C.No.1 of 2021. seeking bail, this petition is filed by the petitioner. 3.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the records.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD) No.8469 of 2022 4.The petitioner is at liberty to move the trial court on medical ground. It may not be possible for this court to take up matter in the immediate future.

5.Considering the aforesaid fact and also the fact that there is intervening vacation, the petitioner is at liberty to move the trial Court seeking bail on the medical ground. If such petition is moved, the trial court may consider the same on its own merits by calling for the report from the concerned prison authority without being influenced by the observation made by this Court in the earlier orders.

6.The leanred counsel for the petitioner sought direction that the parents of the prisioner may also be permitted to assist the accused in the prision hospital. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to make appropriate representation before the concerned Superintendent of Prision, Madurai and the same may be considered as per Rules on humanitarian grounds, since it has been submitted that the petitioner is affected by paralysis.

7.with the above liberty, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

sd/- 29/04/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

1. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT FOR EC AND NDPS CASES, PUDUKOTTAI.

2. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUPPUVANAM POLICE STATION,SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT,CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/s.J.VIJAYARAJA, Advocate ( SR-4209[I] dated 29/04/2022 ) ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.8469 of 2022 Date :29/04/2022 CP MS/JM/SAR-4/02.05.2022/2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2