Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/18098/2016ordered

A. Ranjith Kumar, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2016-09-22Honourable Mr Justice C. T. Selvam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Second day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM CRL OP(MD) No.18098 of 2016 A. RANJITH KUMAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED-1 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI IN CRIME NO. 64 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.J.DEVASENAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Petitioner/A1, prays for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for the offences punishable under Sections 498(a), 294(b), 406, 494 and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.64 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police. 2.

The case of the prosecution is that the de facto complainant is the wife of the petitioner. She preferred a complaint against the petitioner and his family members stating that they are harassing the petitioner by demanding additional dowry. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4.Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that investigation is pending.

5.On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made, this Court is of the view that the petitioner can be granted the relief prayed for and accordingly; (a) In the event of arrest by or on appearance before the respondent police;

(b) In the event of appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tirumangalam, within 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, (i) the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

each for the likesum to their satisfaction;

(ii)the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;

(iii)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for two weeks and thereafter as and when required.

sd/- 22/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUMANGALAM,MADURAI DISTRICT.

2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.J.DEVASENAN Advocate SR.No.55267

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18098 of 2016 Date :22/09/2016 PA/SK-SKN/AR I/26.09.2016/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/