Dilshath Begum v. The Commissioner Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.09.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM Crl.O.P.(MD).No.18178 of 2016 Dilshath Begum .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli City, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.

3.The Inspector of Police, Pulivalam Police Station, Tiruchirappalli District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner and her family members under the guise of enquiry without due process of law on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 07.09.2016.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan For respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry.

2. Heard the learned counsel on either side.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), would submit that the enquiry has been conducted and closed. He has further submitted that since the complaint has already been closed, there is no scope for harassment at all.

4. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side) /True Copy/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub-Assistant Registrar

To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli City, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.

3.The Inspector of Police, Pulivalam Police Station, Tiruchirappalli District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+One cc to Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Advocate, SR.No.56019 PJL RL/6C/2P/SK/SKN/7.10.2016 Crl.O.P(MD)No.18178 of 2016 23.09.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/