Senthurpandi v. The Sub Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Sixth day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM CRL OP(MD) No.18347 of 2016 1 SENTHURPANDI 2 MUTHURAMALINGAM ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos. 2 & 3 Vs STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERAIYUR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT CR.NO. 40 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.UTHAYAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Petitioners/accused, prays for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C for the offences punishable under Section 25(1)(a) of Arms Act, 1959 and in Crime No.40 of 2016 on the file of respondent police.
2. The case of the prosecution is that a vehicle was found with country made weapons and the same was kept for cutting Kattu Karuvel Trees.
3.Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on the basis of confession of the driver of the vehicle the petitioners were implicated in this case.
4.Heard learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side).
5. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made, this Court is of the view that the petitioners can be granted the relief prayed for and accordingly; (a) In the event of arrest by or on appearance before the respondent police;
(b) In the event of appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District, within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order, (i) petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on each of them executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum to their satisfaction;
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
(ii) petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;
(iii) petitioners shall be available for interrogation by the respondent police daily at 10.30. am for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required.
sd/- 26/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.-I) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KAMUTHI,RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERAIYUR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.A.UTHAYAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.55796
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.18347 of 2016 Date :26/09/2016 PA/SK-SKN/SAR I/28.09.2016/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/