Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/18459/2016disposed of

V. Santhosam v. The Deputy Inspector General

2016-09-27Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.09.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM Crl.O.P.(MD).No.18459 of 2016 V.Santhosam .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Ramanathapuram Range, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Paramakudi Division, Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Town Police Station, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to harass the petitioner on the basis of the complaint given by Kavitha with regard to the property in Door No.3/842-C2.

For Petitioner : Mr.Niranjan S.Kumar For respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the respondents 3 and 4 not to harass the petitioner on the basis of the complaint given by Kavitha with regard to the property in Door No.3/842-C2. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the

respondent Police frequently called the petitioner to the Police Station and harassed him under the guise of enquiry in respect of a civil dispute.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that petitioner was called only for enquiry in respect of a petition pending against him on the complaint given by one Kavitha and not to decide the civil rights of the parties in the Police Station and that the respondent Police did not cause any harassment to the petitioner. However, he gave an undertaking that if at all the presence of the petitioner is required, the respondent would call the petitioner for enquiry only after issuing summons giving specific date, time and place. 5.Recording the above undertaking given by the learned Government Advocate, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(co) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar ssl To 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Ramanathapuram Range, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Paramakudi Division, Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Town Police Station, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

5.The Addl. Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.Niranjan S.Kumar,Advocate Sr.No. 56520 JAM/18.10.16/EM-MPA -2P-7C Crl.O.P(MD)No.18459 of 2016 27.09.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/