Thangaraj v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH CRL OP(MD) No.7829 of 2018 1 THANGARAJ 2 MURUGAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SEDAPATTY POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.93/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.J.SENTHIL KUMARAIAH Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners / Accused Nos.1 and 3 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294 (b), 324 and 323 IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act in Crime No.93 of 2018 and seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that due to previous motive, the petitioners are said to have quarrelled with the defacto complainant, abused her in filthy language and also assaulted her. He further submitted that injured has been discharged from the hospital.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

sd/- 16/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PERAIYUR.

2 -DO- THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SEDAPATTY POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.J.SENTHIL KUMARAIAH Advocate SR.No.8622

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7829 of 2018 Date :16/05/2018 JM/SV MMS/GSR/22.05.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/