S.Mariammal, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Seventh day of April Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.5250 of 2017 S.MARIAMMAL ... PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KABISTHALAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.99 OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.POORNACHANDRAN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A-1, in Crime No.99 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323, 379, 506(ii) of I.P.C and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women act, 2002 and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State. 3.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent on instructions submitted due to dispute among neighbours the petitioner along with other accused, said to have attacked the defacto complainant causing injuries. She further submitted that the injured was discharged from the hospital. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Papanasam and on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 5.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 27/04/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,PAPANASAM, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KUMBAKONAM AT THANJAVUR DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KABISTHALAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.S.POORNACHANDRAN Advocate SR.No.21306 PM CSL/BS/SAR-IV/03.05.2017 : 2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5250 of 2017 Date :27/04/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/