Rajmohan v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Kottampatti

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 03.03.2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE. K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN CRL.OP.(MD).No.4723 of 2026 1.Rajmohan 2.Rajadurai ... Petitioners Vs.

The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Inspector of Police, Kottampatti Police Station, Melur, Madurai District.

(Crime No.56 of 2026) ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.V.Malaiyendran For Respondent : Mr.M.Karunanithi Government Advocate (Criminal Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER in all cases :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 56 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER: The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 324(3), 351(2) of 1/5

BNS, 2023 / Sections 294(b), 323, 506(i), 427 of IPC r/w. Section 4 of TNPHW Act, 2002, in Crime No.56 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute on 17.02.2026, both parties made wordy quarrel and caused injuries to each other. Hence, a case has been registered as against the petitioners. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the due to the dispute between the parties both parties made wordy quarrel and made assault upon each other. Hence, there was case in counter. All the injured persons were discharged from the hospital. He seeks this Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent on instructions submitted that there is no previous case is pending against the petitioners. Both parties sustained injuries and the injured were discharged from the hospital.

2/5

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and there is "case" and "counter case" and injured discharged from hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order made ready and on further conditions that: [a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity. [b]the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of fifteen days and thereafter, as and when required. [c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the 3/5

petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

03.03.2026 TM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Melur.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kottampatti Police Station, Melur, Madurai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN,J TM

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4723 of 2026 Date : 03.03.2026 5/5