Baskaran v. The Sub Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Seventh day of April Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.5302 of 2017 1 BASKARAN 2 MUTHU ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNWON Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE YERWADI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT, IN CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.V.MAHARAJAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate(Criminal Side), PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused in Crime No.79 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 341, 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that due to previous enmity, the petitioners are alleged to have abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and also attacked him. The petitioners are innocent. They have not committed any offence as alleged in the complaint.
4.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent / Police submitted that the injured has taken treatment in the private hospital and that there is no previous case against the petitioners. The investigation is pending.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 27/04/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NANGUNERI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE YERWADI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.V.MAHARAJAN Advocate SR.No.21430
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.5302 of 2017 Date :27/04/2017 SVA/BS/04.05.2017/SAR4/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/