Prajin, S/O.Kilimas, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH CRL OP(MD) No.7850 of 2018 1 PRAJIN, 2 SAVIER, 3 SHAJAN, ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO. 1 TO 3 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAZHUGAL POLICE STATION, PAZHUGAL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.43 OF 2018. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.KARTHICK SUBRAMANIAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 447 and 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002 in Cr.No.43 of 2018 and seek anticipatory bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. 3.Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the accused have trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant, abused her in filthy language, pelted stone at her and also threatened her with dire consequences and she was also discharged from the hospital.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

bail to the petitioners.

5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kuzhithurai or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

sd/- 16/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1,KUZHITHURAI 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGARCOIL 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAZHUGAL POLICE STATION, PAZHUGAL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.RM.LOGANATHAN Advocate SR.No.8844

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7850 of 2018 Date :16/05/2018 MYR/CMR PK/RR/VK/ 18.05.2018-2P-6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/