Stalin Deivendran, S/O.Alliraj v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH CRL OP(MD) No.7915 of 2018 STALIN DEIVENDRAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.1 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SANKARANKOVIL, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.09 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.P.T.RAMESH RAJA Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 498(A), 294(b), 506(i) of IPC and Section 40 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.09 of 2015, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that since the petitioner demanded additional dowry from the defacto complainant, she lodged the present complaint against the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. 4.Heard the Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Sankarankovil, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

sd/- 16/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SANKARANKOVIL, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SANKARANKOVIL, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.P.T.RAMESH RAJA Advocate SR.No.8528 RMI JAM/21/05/2018/ PN/GSR /2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7915 of 2018 Date :16/05/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/