R.Rathinakumar, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of May Two Thousand and Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH CRL OP(MD) No.8081 of 2018 R.RETNAKUMAR, ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.8 OF 2017) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.K.HEMA KARTHIKEYAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A2, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Section 420 IPC in Crime No.8 of 2017 and seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 3.Learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State submitted that the petitioner and his wife entered into a sale agreement between the de-facto complainant and received a sum of Rs.

40,00,000/- as advance and thereafter, when the de-facto complainant went to the said place, A4 restrained the de-facto complainant that the land is not belong to the petitioner. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that this case pertains to civil dispute, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

sd/- 16/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I NAGERCOIL.

2.DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE , KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.K.HEMA KARTHIKEYAN Advocate SR.No.8614

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8081 of 2018 Date :16/05/2018 ns/aav AE/DD/GSR/21.05.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/