Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/18751/2016ordered

Raja v. The Inspector Of Police,

2016-10-03Honourable Mr Justice B. Gokuldas2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Third day of October Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.GOKULDAS CRL OP(MD) No.18751 of 2016 RAJA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUPUVANAM POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.461 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.BANUMATHY Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 353 and 506(i) IPC in Crime No.461 of 2016, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The Case of the prosecution is that the petitioner threatened the driver and conductor of the State Transport Corporation bus and he also told them that he would set fire the bus.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and his name has been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner is arrayed as A1 and A2 was already arrested and still in custody.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with the following condition. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai, within a period of 10 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, and on his https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

executing a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. sd/- 03/10/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAMADURAI.

2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUPUVANAM POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.A.BANUMATHY Advocate SR.No.59090.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18751 of 2016 Date :03/10/2016 AM/CK/SAR-II/05.10.2016/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/