V.Krishnan Alias Kittu, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH CRL OP(MD) No.7896 of 2018 V.KRISHNAN ALIAS KITTU ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.1 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MURPANAD POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.68/2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : MR.KA.RAAMAKRISHINAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294 (b), 323, 506 (ii) IPC in Crime No.68 of 2018 and seek anticipatory bail. 2.

The case of the prosecution is that there was a quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant and the petitioners entered into a wordy quarrel with the defacto complainant, caused injury and threatened him. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. 4.Learned Government Advocate submitted that the defacto complaint has been discharged from hospital.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that the injured was discharged from hospital, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikuntum, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

sd/- 16/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVAIKUNTUM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT 2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MURPANAD POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.KA.RAAMAKRISHINAN Advocate SR.No.8987 MYR/CMR JAM/23/05/2018/ PN/RNB /2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7896 of 2018 Date :16/05/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/