← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/5430/2017ordered

Oorkavalan, S/O.Karuppaiah, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2017-04-28Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Eighth day of April Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.5430 of 2017 1 OORKAVALAN 2 KALYANAKUMAR ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ETTAYAPURAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.136 OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 & A2 in Crime No.136 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 294(b) and 506(i) IPC and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are alleged to have encroached the land of the defacto complainant by creating bogus documents and when it was questioned by the defacto complainant, they are alleged to have threatened him with dire consequences. He would further submit that due to property dispute, the present false complaint has been lodged by the defacto complainant. The petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged in the complaint.

4.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent / Police submitted that there are totally two accused in this case and that the investigation is pending. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kovilpatti and on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 28/04/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II,KOVILPATTI. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ETTAYAPURAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate SR.No.21525 GCG CSL/KKR/SAR-IV/03.05.2017 :2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5430 of 2017 Date :28/04/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/