Thangam @ Porikadalai v. The Sub-Inspector Of Polcie
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the First day of June Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.5447 of 2017 1 THANGAM @ PORIKADALAI 2 KOMBAIAH 3 KANIYAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1,3 & 4 Vs THE STATE REP.BY ITS, THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLCIE MURAPPA NADU POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT CRIME NO. 71/2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.B.PERUMAL PRABHU Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additioanl Public Prosecutor, PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A-1, A-3 and A-4, in Crime No.71 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 379 of I.P.C and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor on instructions submitted that the petitioner committed theft of one Unit of sand. He further submitted that there is no previous case pending against the first and second petitioners and insofar as the third petitioner is concerned, he is a history sheeted rowdy.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam and on each of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 01/06/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,SRIVAIKUNDAM, TUTICORIN DISTRICT. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN. 3 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLCIE MURAPPA NADU POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.B.PERUMAL PRABHU Advocate SR.No.23009 PM CSL/CM-MSA/SAR-IV/02.06.2017 :2P/6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.5447 of 2017 Date :01/06/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/