Mohamed Meera v. The Regional Passport Officer
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.03.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH Mohamed Meera : Petitioner Vs.
1. The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Truchirapalli, New Municipal Complex, Thillai Nagar 7th Cross, Trichy.
2. The Inspector of Police, Adirampattinam Police Station, Thanjavur District.
: Respondents P RAYER:
Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to issue renew the petitioners passport by considering the petitioners application taken on file as File No. TR1077115658124 within the time that may be stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.S.Haroon Rasheed For Respondents : Mr.K.Gokul CGSC for R1 1/5
Mr.K.Gnanasekaran Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R2
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the first respondent to renew the petitioner's passport by considering his application in File No. TR1077115658124. 2.The petitioner has made an application in File No. TR1077115658124, for renewal of passport. However, upon receiving an adverse police verification report, the first respondent refused to renew the passport. Hence, this Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.) appearing for the second respondent, on instructions, submitted that Crime No.235 of 2022 culminated in laying charge sheet in F.R.No.342 of 2022, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District.
4. Heard the learned counsels on either side and carefully perused the entire materials available on record. 2/5
5. The petitioner is given liberty to move the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District, for the relief now sought for. As and when such miscellaneous petition is filed, it shall be numbered and disposed of within a period of three weeks thereafter. The learned Trial Judge shall bear in mind that right to travel abroad is a fundamental right. The petitioner's career and avocation may be at stake if he is denied the right to go abroad. Therefore, the learned Trial Court unless there are extraordinary circumstances shall not deny relief. Of course, the period of validity of passport will have to be restricted. It is also open to the learned Trial Judge to stipulate appropriate conditions to ensure that the prosecution is not stalled on account of the petitioner-s absence from India. If necessary, the applicant can be directed to file an application under Section 228 of Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by executing a special vakalat.
6. Based on the order passed by the learned Trial Court, the petitioner shall move the jurisdictional Regional Passport Officer who shall dispose of the petition~mentioned application in terms of the said order.
3/5
7. This Writ Petition is allowed on these terms. There shall be no order as to costs.
19.03.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PKN To
1. The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Truchirapalli, New Municipal Complex, Thillai Nagar 7th Cross, Trichy.
2. The Inspector of Police, Adirampattinam Police Station, Thanjavur District.
3. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District. 4/5
VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
PKN W.P.(MD) No.6911 of 2025 19.03.2025 5/5