Manivannan v. Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fourth day of October Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.GOKULDAS CRL OP(MD) No.18832 of 2016 1 MANIVANNAN 2 KANNAN 3 VIKRAM 4 VIJAY 5 SAMI AYYA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI (CRIME NO.3/2016) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.D.RAMESHKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.P.KANDASAMY, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 294(b), 354-A, 406 IPC r/w. Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.3 of 2016, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that from the date of marriage onwards, all the petitioners said to have demanded more dowry and harassed the defacto complainant.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and their names have been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) submitted that petitioners are in-laws and there is a family dispute among the parties.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am

inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with the following condition. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pudukkottai, within a period of 10 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

sd/- 04/10/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKKOTTAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKKOTTAI 3 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI 4 THE THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.D.RAMESHKUMAR Advocate SR.No.59174 JAM/13.10.16/CK/SAR 2/2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18832 of 2016 Date :04/10/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/