← Library
Madras High CourtREV.APLW(MD)/84/2025closed

K.Udhaya Geetha v. P.Muthukumar

2025-06-26Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 26.06.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Rev.Aplw.(MD)No.84 of 2025 in W.P.(MD)No.17947 of 2023 and W.M.P(MD)No.12563 of 2025 K.Udhaya Geetha, BT Assistant (English), Melayakudi, Paramakudi Taluk, Now presently working as BT Assistant(English), Mandapam Camp,

...Petitioner/6th Respondent

Vs 1.P.Muthukumar 2.The Director, DPI Complex, Noongampakkam, Chennai.

1/5

3.The Joint Director (Employment Unit), DPI Complex, Nungampakkam, Chennai.

4.The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Officer, 5.The Head Master, Melayakudi, Paramakudi Taluk, 6.The Head Master, Government High School, Kulathur, Ramanathapuram District.

...Respondents/Respondents

PRAYER: Review Application is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 & 2 r/w Section 114 of C.P.C., against the order dated 18.09.2024 passed in W.P.(MD)No. 17947 of 2023, and allow the writ petition as prayed for. PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus, calling for the entire records connected with the order in Na.Ka.No.09568/C3/E2/2023, dated 09.05.2023, passed by the respondent No.2 and consequential order in Na.Ka.No.2 of 2023, dated 08.06.2023, passed by 5th respondent and quash the same, consequently directing the respondents to transfer the petitioner to 4th respondent school within the time stipulated by this Court.

For Appellant : Mr.H.Mohammed Imran for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate for R2 to R6 2/5

ORDER

The present review application has been filed by the 6th respondent in the writ petition seeking to review the order passed by this Court dated 18.09.2024, made in W.P(MD)No.17947 of 2023.

2.A perusal of the order reveals that the transfer order in favour of the 6th respondent has been quashed and a direction was issued to the authorities to accommodate the writ petitioner in the 4th respondent school. 3.The review application has been filed expressing grievances that some preference should be granted to the 6th respondent, in case of any further transfer order. When the order impugned in the writ petition was issued on the ground of administrative exigency, it is for the petitioner to approach the authorities seeking preference. Therefore, the question of reviewing the order passed by this Court does not arise.

4.With the above said observations, this Review Application stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

26.06.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR 3/5

To 1.The Director, DPI Complex, Noongampakkam, Chennai.

2.The Joint Director (Employment Unit), DPI Complex, Nungampakkam, Chennai.

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Officer, 4.The Head Master, Melayakudi, Paramakudi Taluk, 5.The Head Master, Government High School, Kulathur, Ramanathapuram District.

4/5

R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J.

RJR Rev.Aplw.(MD)No.84 of 2025 in W.P.(MD)No.17947 of 2023 and W.M.P(MD)No.12563 of 2025 26.06.2025 5/5