Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14260/2021allowed

Ajith Kumar v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-10-26Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14260 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.10.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14260 of 2021 1.Ajith Kumar 2.Sathiyauthiradevi 3.Muthudevi @ Mutheeswari ... Petitioners/Accused 1 to 3 Vs.

1.The Inspector of Police, Keenikarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

Crime No.679 of 2020) .. Respondent/Complainant 2.Karthigairaj .. Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records pertaining to F.I.R. in Crime No.679 of 2020 under Sections 147, 294(b), 323, 506(i) of IPC r/w 109 of IPC dated 07.11.2020 and quash the same as illegal as against the petitioners/accused.

For Petitioners : Mr.D.Balamurugapandi For R1 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.T.Venkatesan

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned FIR in Crime No.679 of 2020 on the file of the 1st respondent police. 2.The contention of the petitioners is that based on the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.679 of 2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323, 506(i) of IPC r/w 109 of IPC against the petitioners.

3.The further contention of the petitioners is that they compromised the issue with the 2nd respondent amicably. A joint memo of compromise was filed, which has been duly signed by the petitioners and the 2nd respondent and also by their respective counsels.

4.The petitioners and the 2nd respondent appeared through video conference from the Office of the Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) before this Court along with their counsels and also https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14260 of 2021 produced their Aadhar cards. They were also identified by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) and the Investigation Officer. Both the parties were enquired by me and they accepted the terms of compromise. Hence, the Compromise Memo is recorded.

5.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and also in view of the joint compromise memo, dated 22.10.2021, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending. Hence, all further proceedings in Crime No.679 of 2020 pending on the file of the 1st respondent police is quashed and the compromise memo is recorded.

6.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the entire proceedings in Crime No.679 of 2020, pending on the file of the 1st respondent police is hereby quashed in respect of the petitioners and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part of this order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TM Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

ENCL: Xerox Copy of Joint Compromise Memo To:- 1.The Inspector of Police, Keenikarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.D. BALAMURUGAPANDI, Advocate (SR-32898[F] dated 27/10/2021) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14260 of 2021 26.10.2021 TP(CO) GC/NS(23.11.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2