V.Perumal v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.02.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Criminal Original Petition (MD) No.1892 of 2016 V.Perumal ... Petitioner vs.

State rep.by The Inspector of Police Taluk Police Station Sivagangai Sivagangai Taluk ... Respondent PRAYER: This petition is preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner in the name of enquiry.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mahalingam For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, G.A.(Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to direct the respondent Police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent and perused the materials placed on record.

3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that, on a complaint given by one Karthikeya Udayakumar, petition enquiry was conducted and the same was closed after investigation.

4. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), this criminal original petition is closed. Sd/ Assistant Registrar ((CS-I) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Sivagangai, Sivagangai Taluk.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1CC to S.Mahalingam, Advocate in Sr.No.7085 KRK CN/GSV-AN/12.2.2016/4C-2P Crl.O.P(MD).No.1892 of 2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/