Muthu Kaleeswari v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fourth day of May Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice N.AUTHINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.5607 of 2017 MUTHU KALEESWARI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO:3 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOVILANKULAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT, CRIME NO.32/2017 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.BABU JAGANATH Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(i) IPC in Crime No.32 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and that anticipatory bail may be granted to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that A.1 was granted anticipatory bail by this Court and A.2 was arrested and released on bail by the lower Court and the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

5.Having regard to the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kamudhi, Ramanathapuram District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 04/05/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KAMUTHI RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOVILANKULAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.R.BABU JAGANATH Advocate SR.No.21868

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5607 of 2017 Date :04/05/2017 SVA/KKR/05.05.2017/SAR4/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/