← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8079/2018ordered

M.Mohamed Feroze v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-05-16Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH CRL OP(MD) No.8079 of 2018 M.MOHAMED FEROZE ... PETITIONER / A1 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C 3, PERUMALPURAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

(CR. NO.54/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.J.MOHAMED KASSIM Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A1, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, in Crime No.54 of 2018 and seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 3.Learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State submitted that the petitioner is arrayed as A1, who is the husband of the de-facto complainant and the father and mother of A1 took 50 sovereign of gold from the de-facto complainant and also harassed her.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that this case pertains to matrimonial dispute, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

sd/- 16/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TIRUNELVELI.

2 -DO- THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C 3, PERUMALPURAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.A.J.MOHAMED KASSIM Advocate SR.No.8608

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8079 of 2018 Date :16/05/2018 JM/SV MMS/GSR/21.05.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/