Jeen @ Andro Jeen v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH CRL OP(MD) No.7996 of 2018 JEEN @ ANDRO JEEN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARUNGAL POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

IN CRIME NO.259 of 2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.R.SREENIVASAN, Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 294 (b), 323, 324, 506(ii) IPC and Section 3 (I) of TNPPDL Act, 1992 in Crime No.259 of 2016 and seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners and others were breaking the defacto complainant's car and abused him with filthy language and assaulted him.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 4.Learned Government Advocate submitted that charge sheet has been laid and the same is not yet taken on file. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that the charge sheet has been laid and the same is not yet taken on file, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

sd/- 16/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ERANIEL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDCIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARUNGAL POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.M.R.SREENIVASAN, Advocate SR.No.8480

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7996 of 2018 Date :16/05/2018 PK/RR/VK/18.05.2018 : 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/