Senthilkumar,S/O.Kasi Nadar, v. The District Revefnue Officer,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.04.2017 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN WA (MD) No.228 of 2015 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2015 SenthilKumar Representing as Power Agent of 1.C.Kannan 2.C.Geethalakshmi 3.C.Lalitha Lakshmi ...Appellant/Petitioner

Versus

1. The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

3. The Tahsildar, Kadaladi Taluk, Kadaladi, Ramanathapuram District.

4.Ammanulla Kani 5.Seeni Hussain Kani 6.Ibrahim Kani 7.Zahir Hussain 8.Syed Ahamed Kabir 9.Bahadursha 10.Rahamuthulla 11.Ibrahim Kani 12.Batcha 13.Raja Mohammed

...Respondent /Respondent

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order dated 07.01.2015 made in W.P.(MD)No.17193 of 2014. Prayer in WP(MD). 17193/ 2014 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the Impugned order passed by the 1st Respondent in Na.Ka. P5/143/2014 dated 01.10.2014 issued to the petitioner and quash the same as illegal.

For Appellants : Mr.R.R.Kannan For Respondents 1-3 : Mr.S.Chandrasekar Government Advocate For Respondent 4-7 : Mr.R.Subramanian https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J) Heard Mr.R.R.Kannan , the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr.S.Chandrasekar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1-3 and Mr.R.Subramanian, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 4-7.

2.This Writ Appeal is directed against the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.17193 of 2014 filed by the respondent. 3.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the writ petition was filed challenging the interim order passed by the first respondent dated 01.10.2014 and the writ petition was dismissed, as against which, this appeal has been filed.

4.Subsequently, the first respondent has passed orders, which has been challenged separately by the appellant in W.P.(MD) No.5101 of 2005.

5.In the light of the subsequent development, nothing further needs to be adjudicated in this appeal. 6.Accordingly, this appeal stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

3. The Tahsildar, Kadaladi Taluk, Kadaladi, Ramanathapuram District.

+1 cc to Mr.R.R.Kannan, Advocate, SR.No.19182 +1 cc to Mr.R.Subramanian, Advocate, SR.No.50038 +1 cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No. 50319 Judgment in WA (MD) No.228 of 2015 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2015 Dated:04.04.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ ARUL/GK MKV-JC-SAR 4/20.4.2017/2P-7C