Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6110/2020withdrawn dismissed

M.Prakash v. The Deputy Inspector General Of Police

2020-06-19Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6110 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.06.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Crl.O.P(MD)No.6110 of 2020 1.M.Prakash 2.M.Dinesh ... Petitioners Vs 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, D.I.G Office, Subramanyapuram, Trichy-620020.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Subramanyapuram, Trichy-620020.

3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Subramanyapuram, Trichy-620020.

4.Mohammed Shajahan ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the third respondent police not to harass the petitioners on the guise of enquiry on basis of the false complaint lodged by the fourth respondent and consequently, direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.06.2020. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Sukumar For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.K.Ramakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent police not to harass the petitioner on the guise of enquiry on basis of the complaint lodged by the fourth respondent and consequently, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.06.2020. 2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that one Kanchana Siva Sankar lodged a complaint against the petitioners and three others alleging that the second petitioner has taken the original documents from one Soosai, who is her relative, to sell the property. But, without her knowledge, the second petitioner has mortgaged the property with another accused to the tune of Rs.8,00,000/-. When the complainant came to know about the same, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6110 of 2020 petitioners gave a cheque, but when it was submitted for collection, the same was returned.

3.According to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, in view of the pendency of this petition before this Court, the respondent Police are not in a position to proceed with the petition enquiry.

4.At this stage, the petitioner's counsel sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and undertakes to co-operate with the enquiry before the respondent police. 5.Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar () // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) rmi/vs NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, D.I.G Office, Subramanyapuram, Trichy-620020.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Subramanyapuram, Trichy-620020.

3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Subramanyapuram, Trichy-620020.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P(MD)No.6110 of 2020 19.06.2020 KB(25.06.2020) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2