Inbaraj, v. K.Alaguraja,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.10.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 1 of 2015 W.A(MD)No.371 of 2015 Inbaraj ... Appellant/3rd Respondent Vs 1.K.Alaguraja ...1st Respondent/Petitioner 2.The Chief Engineer (Distribution) Tamilnadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation, Madurai Division, K.Pudur, Madurai-625 007.

3.The Assistant Engineer (Distribution), Tamilnadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation, Uthappanaickanur, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District.

...Respondents 2 & 3/

Respondents 1 & 2 PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order dated 05.08.2014 made in W.P(MD)No.12747 of 2014 and allow this writ appeal.

1/5

W.A(MD)No.372 of 2015 Inbaraj ... Appellant/3rd Respondent Vs 1.K.Alaguraja ...1st Respondent/Petitioner 2.The Chief Engineer (Distribution) Tamilnadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation, Madurai Division, K.Pudur, Madurai-625 007.

3.The Assistant Engineer (Distribution), Tamilnadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation, Uthappanaickanur, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District.

...Respondents 2 & 3/

Respondents 1 & 2 PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order dated 09.09.2014 made in W.P(MD)No.12747 of 2014 and allow this writ appeal.

For Appellant : Mr.J.Barathan For R1 : Mr.D.Malaichamy For R2 & R3 : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel 2/5

COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.) The present writ appeals have been preferred by the third respondent in the writ petition challenging the interim order passed on 05.08.2014 and 09.09.2014.

2. The first respondent herein as writ petitioner has filed W.P(MD)No.12747 of 2014 seeking a mandamus directing the Electricity Board to restore the agriculture electricity service connection. An interim order was passed on 05.08.2014 and subsequently on 09.09.2014 stay already granted was made absolute directing the Electricity Board to restore the service connection within a period of two weeks.

3. Challenging the said orders, these appeals have been preferred by the third respondent in the writ petition, who makes a rival claim over the property in dispute.

4. Pending writ appeals, main writ petition has been disposed of on 21.04.2021, wherein, it is observed that the electricity 3/5

service connection have already been restored, the parties have been directed to work out their remedies in the pending civil suit in O.S.No.34 of 2014, pending on the file of the District Munsif Court, Usilampatti.

5. In view of the disposal of the main writ petition, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the writ appeals, which are arises out of the interim orders of the writ Court.

6. Accordingly, these writ appeals are closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. (C.V.K., J.) (R.V., J.) 16.10.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No am 4/5

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

and R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

am ORDER MADE IN 16.10.2025 5/5