Nagarathinam, S/O.Manickam, v. The Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH CRL OP(MD) No.8122 of 2018 NAGARATHINAM ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANNACHANALLUR POLICE STATION, MANACHANALLUR, TRICHY DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.T.VADIVELAN, Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Section 379 IPC r/w. Section 21 (1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.Not Known of 2018 and seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he was involved in transportation of sand illegally.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that the petitioner is involved in transporting the sand illegally and the same has been recovered. He further submitted that there is no previous case against the petitioner herein. 5.Taking note of the above facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Musiri, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.
sd/- 16/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MUSIRI, TRICHY DISTRICT. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDCIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANNACHANALLUR POLICE STATION, MANACHANALLUR, TRICHY DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.T.VADIVELAN, Advocate SR.No.8811
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.8122 of 2018 Date :16/05/2018 SDS/VC/RNB/22.05.2018 : 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/