Raihana v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of May Two Thousand and Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH CRL OP(MD) No.8207 of 2018 1.RAIHANA 2.FAROOK ABDULAH 3.UMAR FAROOK ABDULAH 4.MOHAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 4 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL.

(CRIME NO.09/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.R.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A4, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 120(b), 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC, in Crime No.09 of 2018 and seek anticipatory bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. 3.Learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State submitted the petitioner cheated the de-facto complainant by making false promise to sell the first petitioner's property. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and

taking note of the fact that this case pertains to civil dispute, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. sd/- 16/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, DINDIGUL.

2.DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate SR.No.8824

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8207 of 2018 Date :16/05/2018 AE/DD/GSR/21.05.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/