← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8218/2018partly allowed

Balathandayuthapani v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-05-16Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH CRL OP(MD) No.8218 of 2018 1 BALATHANDAYUTHAPANI 2 RAJALAKSHMI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs STATE, REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI(Crime No.65/2015) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.S.MAHENDRAPATHY Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Government Advocate (Crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 and A2, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 406, 420 and 506(i) IPC, in Crime No.65 of 2015 and seek anticipatory bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. 3.Learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State submitted the petitioners had received a lumpsum from the defacto complainant's brother to get a job in the Secretariat and they have neither returned the money nor got a job. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that the second petitioner/A2 is the wife of the first petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the second petitioner/A2. 5.Accordingly, the second petitioner/A2 is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the second petitioner/A2 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

6.Insofar as the first petitioner is concerned, this petition is dismissed as against the first petitioner/A1. sd/- 16/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, MADURAI 2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8218 of 2018 Date :16/05/2018 SH/VC/RNB:22.05.2018:2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/