Perumal v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH CRL OP(MD) No.8237 of 2018 1 PERUMAL 2 GANESAN 3 PASUPATHI AMMAL 4 KANAGAVALLI 5 SELVAMANI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 to 5 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, M.REDDIYAPATTI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.R.GANESAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 448, 324, 427 and 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of TNWH Act in Crime No.50 of 2018 and seek anticipatory bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. 3.Learned Government Advocate submitted that the injured is still in hospital.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that the injured is still in hospital, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners 3 to 5 alone.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners 3 to 5 are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners 3 to 5 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. 7.Insofar as the petitioners 1 and 2 are concerned, this criminal original petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- 16/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE M.REDDIYAPATTI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT .

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.GANESAN Advocate SR.No.8494.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8237 of 2018 Date :16/05/2018 SDS/PMI/RNB/22.05.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/