J.Jenita Fancy v. The Directorate Of School Education
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.10.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.6091 & 7090 of 2020 J.Jenita Fancy ... Petitioner -vs1.The Directorate of School Education School Education Department DPI Complex, Chennai 2.The Chief Educational Officer Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli 3.The District Educational Officer Tirunelveli Educational District Tirunelveli 4.The Correspondent Mary Sargent Girls Higher Secondary School Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District 5.The Administrators No.1680/8, North High Ground Road St.Johns College Hostel Campus Near Krishna Hospital, Palayamkottai Tirunelveli District
6.Ida Mano Jebasty ... Respondents [R6 is impleaded vide Court Order dated 21.07.2020 in W.M.P.(MD) No.6725 of 2020] PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the fifth respondent to pass orders on the issue of appointment of the petitioner as B.T.Assistant in the fourth respondent School by reviewing their earlier order dated 26.09.2019, by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 18.03.2020. For Petitioner :
Mr.R.Maheswaran For Respondents :
Mr.S.Shaji Bino Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.S.C.Herold Singh for R4 Mr.Thangasivam for R5 Mr.M.Gnanagurunathan for R6
O R D E R
The prayer in this writ petition is for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the fifth respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.03.2020 and appoint her as B.T.Assistant in the fourth respondent - School, by reviewing their earlier order dated 26.09.2019, within a stipulated period.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that ventilating her grievance viz., seeking appointment as B.T.Assistant in the fourth respondent - School, by reviewing the earlier order dated 26.09.2019 passed by the Administrators, the petitioner gave a representation to the respondents as early as on 18.03.2020 and the same is still under consideration with them. Therefore, the learned counsel submitted that it would suffice if a direction is given to the authority concerned to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.03.2020 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a stipulated period.
3. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and the respective learned counsel appearing for the respondents 4 to 6 submitted that the authority concerned will dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 18.03.2020, within a time frame.
4. In view of the above submission, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, the authority concerned is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.03.2020 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after giving
sufficient opportunity of personal hearing to all the parties concerned, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 14.10.2022 (3/4) Index :
Yes / No Internet :
Yes / No krk To:
1.The Directorate of School Education, School Education Department, DPI Complex, Chennai.
2.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
3.The District Educational Officer, Tirunelveli Educational District, Tirunelveli.
R.MAHADEVAN , J.
krk and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.6091 & 7090 of 2020 14.10.2022 (3/4)