Madras High CourtWP(MD)/10880/2014dismissed

Al. Arumugam, S/O. Alagappa v. The District Collector,

2016-09-27Honourable Mr Justice M.V. Muralidaran,Honourable Mr Justice S. Nagamuthu2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.09.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN W.P(MD)No.10880 of 2014 AL. ARUMUGAM S/O. ALAGAPPA THEVAR FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE RESIDENTS 14/5 PANDIMAN KOVIL ST. PON PUDUPATTI PONNAMARAVATHI TALUK PUDUKKOTTAI DT.

- PETITIONER Vs 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR O/O. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

2 THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER PONNAMARAVATHI PANCHAYAT UNION PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

3 THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, PONNAMARAVATHI , PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

4 MRS. ABIRAMI RAMANATHAN, PANCHAYAT PRESIDENT, VEGUPATTI, PONNAMARAVATHI, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

5 IBRAHIM @ KARUTHA LEBBAI, MEMBER VEGUPATTI PANCHAYAT, VEGUPATTI, PONNAMARAVATHI , PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

6 RAJA MOHAMED IBRAHIM @ KARUTHA LEBBAI, PANDIMAN KOVIL ST.

PON PUDUPATTI, PONNAMARAVATHI , PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

- RESPONDENTS Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take suitable action on the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

respondents 4 to 6 to remove the encroachment in Pandiman Ayyanar Temple worship place situated in Pon Pudupatti Ponnamaravathi Taluk Pudukkottai District.

For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.M.Govindan Spl. Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.G.Mathavan for R5, R6 No appearance for R4

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.) The petitioner has come up with this public interest litigation seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to take suitable action on the respondents 4 to 6 to remove the encroachment in Pandiman Ayyanar Temple worship place situated in Pon Pudupatti, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

2. There is no representation for the petitioner. Heard the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3, 5 and 6.

3. The learned counsel for the respondents 5 and 6 would say that they have not encroached any portion of the Temple land. Further, the petitioner has not even given the survey numbers of the land, so as to ensure that whether the said land is poramboke land or encroachment made in the said land and the petitioner has not made a prima facie case for grant of any relief. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl.side) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR , O/O. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR , PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. 2 THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PONNAMARAVATHI PANCHAYAT UNION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. 3 THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, PONNAMARAVATHI, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. RR CSL/SK-SKN/17.10.2016 :2P/4C ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.10880 of 2014 27.09.2016.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/