Muruganantham, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fourteenth day of October Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.19736 of 2016 1 MURUGANANTHAM, 2 KALIAMMAL 3 SELVI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 3 Vs STATE REP BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALANI TALUK POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT (CRIME NO.449 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.D.SELVARAJ Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) I.P.C in Crime No.449 of 2016 and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State and also perused the entire materials available on record.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that injured has been discharged from hospital.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palani, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation and the second and third petitioners, being ladies, shall appear before the respondet police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 14/10/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PALANI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALANI TALUK POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT CR.NO. 449 OF 2016 +1. CC to M/S.D.SELVARAJ Advocate SR.No.60758 RL/6C/2P/DB/SAR2/18.10.2016

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.19736 of 2016 Date :14/10/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/