Madras High CourtWP(MD)/6816/2022disposed of

Kalaiselvi V v. The Zonal Manager

2022-04-12Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose2 pages

W.P.[MD]No.6816 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.04.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.[MD]No.6816 of 2022 V.Kalaiselvi ... Petitioner /Vs./

1. The Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Southern Zone, Zonal Office, LIC Building, Mount Road, Chennai-600 002.

2. Life Insurance Corporation of India, represented by the Senior Divisional Manager, Divisional Office-Jeevan Prakash, Bridge Station Road, Sellur-625 002, Madurai District.

3. The Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India, V.O.C Road, Muthupattinam, Karaikudi-630 001, Sivagangai District.

... Respondents P RAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to disburse petitioner / Agent Commission for rendering her service as an Agent in the office of the 3rd respondent Life Insurance Corporation based on petitioner representation dated 13.07.2021.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondents : Mr.B.Prasanna Vinoth Standing Counsel

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking for a direction to the respondents to disburse petitioner's / Agent's Commission for rendering her service as an Agent in the office of the 3rd respondent Life Insurance Corporation, based on the petitioner's representation dated 13.07.2021, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2.The petitioner claims that she is the agent of the third respondent and that she has not been paid her commission. The petitioner has filed documents along with this writ petition in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.[MD]No.6816 of 2022 respect of her case. It is for the respondents to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law. The petitioner has submitted a representation to the respondents on 13.07.2021 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, this writ petition has been filed.

3.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the representation of the petitioner is considered on merits and in accordance with law. The petitioner has given representation on 13.07.2021 to the respondents calling upon to pay the agency commission, which according to the petitioner, has not been paid. 4.For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 13.07.2021 seeking for payment of her agency commission and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording a fair hearing to the petitioner, within a period of twelve [12] weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5.With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) sm +1 CC to M/s.B. PRASANNA VINOTH, Advocate ( SR-18423[F] dated 13/04/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.G. THALAIMUTHARASU, Advocate ( SR-18635[F] dated 13/04/2022 ) W.P.[MD]No.6816 of 2022 12.04.2022 SB(CO) KB(25.04.2022) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2