Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/19762/2016ordered

Muruganandham v. The Inspector Of Police,

2016-10-14Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fourteenth day of October Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.19762 of 2016 1 MURUGANANDHAM 2 KARTHIKA 3 MARIMUTHU ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1-3 Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TALUK POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGA SIVAGANGA DISTRICT ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT CRIME NO.329/2016 For Petitioner : M/S.N.SATHISH BABU Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who are arrayed as accused Nos. 1 to 3, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 355 and 506 (i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.329 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) submitted that no previous case is pending against the petitioners.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Sivagangai and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first and third petitioners/A1& A3 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required. The second petitioner/A2 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 14/10/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.2, SIVAGANGAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TALUK POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGA, SIVAGANGA DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.N.SATHISH BABU Advocate SR.No.60773

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.19762 of 2016 Date :14/10/2016 GJM/DB/SAR-3/19/10/2016:2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/