G.Vignesh v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Fifth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.6519 of 2017 G.VIGNESH ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED ` RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATTUR TOWN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT, (IN CRIME NO. 302 OF 2017) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.N.SHANMUGASELVAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused in Crime No.302 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioner is alleged to have abused the defacto complainant in filthy language, threatened him and also attacked him. The petitioner is innocent. He has not committed any offence as alleged in the complaint. He has been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent / Police submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and that the investigation is pending.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Sattur and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 05/06/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

GCG TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, SATTUR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATTUR TOWN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.N.SHANMUGASELVAM Advocate SR.No.23158 GJM/PM/PN/SAR-I-7.6.17-2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6519 of 2017 Date :05/06/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/